Eternal Security? How do you fall away?

In a couple of recent posts (1, 2) I’ve reflected on the language of security and falling away in the New Testament. When the suggestion is made that a believer can indeed fall permanently and to his detriment from grace, the question is commonly raised as to how this happens. What does someone have to do fall away? How does a person move from justification to condemnation? Following on from my last post, I’ll focus my comments on Paul’s discussion of the matter in Romans 11.
The starting point must be the comparison that Paul draws between God’s attitude toward unbelieving Israel and his audience in Rome. My previous suggestion that a believer can indeed fall to their peril is based on this comparison in which Paul tells the Roman Christians that Israel was broken off for unbelief; thus, his warning to the Romans, “if God did not spare the original branches, perhaps he will not spare you” (11:21). For the apostle, believing Gentile Christians are liable to the same fate as Israel, namely God might cut them off. The comparison between the Roman church and Israel is developed through a contrast between the faith of the Romans and the unbelief of Israel, “They (Israel) were broken off because of their unbelief (Gk. apistia), but you stand only through faith (Gk. pistis)” (11:20). The explicit contrast of Paul’s Greek is somewhat muted in the English translation of “unbelief” vs. “faith” simply because English doesn’t have a negative word using the root “faith”. The Greek apistia vs. pistis is much stronger, and a more literal translation would say that Israel was “broken off because of their afaith (or unfaith?), but you stand only through faith.” This is enough to highlight the fact that, for Paul, if a person can move from God’s favor into condemnation, it is conditioned on whether or not that one continues in faith in Christ. The logic is quite clear. If it is through faith that we are united to Christ and brought into a state of reconciliation with God, then our unbelief would mean the breaking of our union with Christ, which would also mean that we no longer partake in the blessings of our former union.
Paul’s understanding of the contrast between faith and unbelief becomes increasingly clear when we consider Romans 4:20. Speaking of Abraham, Paul writes, “No unbelief (Gk. apistia) made him doubt the promise of God, but he was empowered by faith (Gk. pistis) giving glory to God.” Note the again the strong contrast between apistia and pistis. Abraham’s righteous standing before God is conditioned on his belief in the promise of God (4:21-22), and the opposite of this by-faith-righteousness is unbelieving condemnation. In Romans, Abraham is the prototypical Gentile believer, because he believed and was justified prior to his circumcision. So, faith in the crucified and risen Christ incorporates even a Gentile believer into Abraham’s family, which is defined around the Messiah. In contrast, unbelief cuts a person off from this family. This is precisely what Paul says happened with ethnic Israel, and in his thinking it is a danger to believers in Rome. Thus, his exhortation to continue in the kindness of God, which is conditioned on perseverance in faith, in order to avoid being cut off (11:22).
Returning to the initial question regarding how one falls away, we can say that the condition for being cut off from the people of God is unbelief or a cessation of faith in Christ. He does not here raise the issue of evil works as a means for falling away, though he would certainly assert that evil works are the product of unbelief. This makes sense in light Paul’s larger soteriology. If a person is justified by faith, then falling into unbelief would necessitate falling out of justified reconciliation with God. One might say that this is all hypothetical for Paul, and that a true believer will never fall into unbelief. The problem with that suggestion is that Paul doesn’t seem to be dealing in hypotheticals. His argument is based on the very concrete and historical example of God’s action to cut off unbelieving Israel. Cutting off, he insists, is the grievous consequence of unbelief. For Paul, it appears to be a real possibility that a justified true believer could fall into unbelief and be cut off from the people of God.

3 thoughts on “Eternal Security? How do you fall away?

  1. Could you even be referring to non-Israelite ones (since not all Israelites were 'Jews')? If when you speak of non-Israelites, you say 'non-Israelites', you'll see no objections from me.

    My objections stem from the mis-use of the Greek word 'nations' which can nearly always be shown to mean exactly what it says 'nations'. 'Gentiles' means non-Israelite individuals which is a meaning differing from nations. There isn't a single instance where the biblical Greek uses the words 'ethnos' where it applies to a class of individuals. The value clarifying is by doing so we differentiate between what the bible says and how it is interpreted.

    Although I agree with you, the believer can fall away into disbelief – Romans 11 isn't making this point. In fact it is doing exactly the opposite.

    Although Paul does speak of the House of Israel being broken off (as branches) his point doesn't stop there. Paul goes on to show how those who had previously fallen away (i.e. the House of Israel) are since being grafted back in. He's talking about Israelite Christian's who have come to faith in Christ.

    Paul's very first verse, [Rom 11:1] sets this up quoting [Psalm 94:14] which starts out:
    “For the LORD will not forsake his people; he will not abandon his heritage;”

    … but then goes on to say ..:

    “for justice will return to the righteous, AND ALL THE UPRIGHT IN HEART WILL FOLLOW IT” [Psa 94:15] [ meaning that those branches who were broken off because of unbelief with upright hearts will be grafted in again.

    He starts by developing this theme in the 4th verse which cites [1Kings 19:18] which speaks about even in Israel's rejection of God, God kept for himself the faithful.

    The spirit of stupor cited in [Rom 11:8] is found in [Isa 6:9] but that spirit of stupor comes to an end at some point when the LORD had removed his people far away [Isa 6:12] which was clearly when Israelite had been dispersed throughout the Greek and Roman Empires.

    It's true [Rom 11:20] speaks to 'branches being broken off' but [Romans 11:21] goes on to reference God's kindness (for having been grafted back in). Some Israelites remained 'broken off'. The Roman Israelites, because of their faith, were being grafted back in.

    The point is that the Roman Israelites who had already been broken off and had been grafted back in, should not jeopardize God's grace again.

    This isn't a comparison between 'church' and Israel with Israel's fall a warning, rather it's Paul's hermeneutic showing that God's word was true, and Israel had been grafted back in, with a warning (to Israelites) not to screw it up again.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s